Archive for April 2014

You are currently browsing the WWJ News blog archives for April, 2014.

Frostbite, falling freight, and forklifts on fire: America’s worst Wal-Mart warehouse, revealed

Monday, April 28th, 2014

Josh Eidelson

Workers at an Indiana Wal-Mart warehouse allege they were subjected to safety risks including falling freight, forklifts on fire, and frostbite – and then illegally fired for organizing in response.

“They never want you to stop working,” said fired worker David Fields. “They want you to keep working – and no matter how unsafe it is, they want you to just keep going.” Fields, who asserts he was fired this month for organizing co-workers to take on safety issues at Walmart Consolidation Center #7100, joined co-workers in filing National Labor Relations Board charges alleging illegal retaliation. He told Salon that a temp agency manager terminated him April 2, the same day workers planned to deliver a petition with 100-some signatures protesting unsafe conditions. “Seeing we were all on the same page,” charged Fields, “they got threatened, and this is why they got rid of me.” He added that management had been intentionally “secretive” about ejecting him: “They took me out the side door, and they basically fired me on lunch.”

Wal-Mart, the only company whose goods move through the Hammond, Indiana, consolidation center, has contracted Linc Logistics (a subsidiary of Universal Truckload Services) to run the facility; Linc has brought in temp agencies Malace HR and Swift Staffing. Wal-Mart, UTS, Malace and Swift did not respond to Salon’s requests for comment on the allegations. Linc “has said the disciplinary actions were unrelated to the protests in January,” according to The Times of Northwest Indiana.


One Year After Rana Plaza, Safety Issues in Walmart Supply Chain Persist

Saturday, April 26th, 2014

By Yana Kunichoff
In These Times


Thirty-some protesters picketed outside of a Walmart Express on Chicago’s North Side yesterday, the one-year anniversary of the Rana Plaza collapse, stressing that the differences in Walmart’s treatment of its workers in the supply chain are only of severity.

David Fields, 44, was among the group of Chicago-area protestors. Fields says he was fired from his job this month—as a forklift driver at a warehouse that supplies Walmart, half an hour south of the city in Hammond, Ind.— because he spoke out about the need for an adequate fire alarm system in the building. And that safety concern was only the tip of the iceberg, said Fields, who had been working at the warehouse since September. “At some point we all started feeling like modern day slaves,” he said, describing his days working in sub-zero temperatures during the icy polar vortex that hit Chicagoland this past winter. “They didn’t care that people were getting frost-bitten.”

Fields’ complaints carry echoes of those commonly made by workers in supply-chain factories overseas, especially the pressure to always speed up production and continue working in severe climate conditions. Najneen Akter Nazma, a factory worker who survived the Rana disaster—though her husband was killed—said she and her husband had been told about a crack running across the floor near his workstation, but knew they couldn’t take a day off work because it would cost them their monthly salary. And for Fields, a slippery floor in the warehouse, wet after a day of rain—which for his supervisors is no excuse to slow down work—carries with it the constant fear of being injured by the heavy loads he used to work with.

Read more at In These Times

Warehouse workers file National Labor Relations Board complaint

Friday, April 18th, 2014

By Joseph S. Pete
NW Indiana Times

Warehouse workers who objected to working in minus 15 degree Fahrenheit weather this winter filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board this week.

They say several workers, including Warehouse Worker Organizing Committee leader David Fields, were fired in retaliation for raising safety concerns, such as that brakes on forklifts were bad and there was not a fire alarm system at the Walmart Consolidation Center #7100 on 141st Street in Hammond. The Unfair Labor Practice charges seek reinstatement and back pay.

“All we want is to be safe at work, moving millions in Walmart freight,” Fields said. “But instead they are fighting us every step of the way. They fired me to try and stop us, but this just makes me want to fight harder to win justice.”


Walmart Workers Win New Policies; Will They Extend to Workers Down Walmart’s Supply Chain?

Thursday, April 17th, 2014

As the saying goes, “When we fight, we win!”

Walmart workers who are members of the Organization United for Respect at Walmart (OUR Walmart) demonstrated this clearly with two recent victories. First, Walmart is instituting a new scheduling policy that will allow workers to know when additional shifts are available and sign up online for them. This is important as many Walmart workers are part-time and struggle to support themselves and their families on too few hours.

The second victory is due to OUR Walmart’s “Respect the Bump” campaign, led mostly by women Walmart workers with support from women’s organizations. Walmart announced it will now ensure that women with pregnancy-related complications are given some basic accommodations that will help them keep their jobs and provide for their families.

Read more at Huffington Post

Illinois AG pushes for payroll card regulations

Saturday, April 12th, 2014

By Alejandra Cancino
Chicago Tribune

When Mike Compton was hired at a warehouse six months ago, his employer handed him what looked like a debit card and told him his wages would be deposited on it.

Nationwide, an increasing number of employers, especially those in low-wage industries like retail and fast food and including companies like McDonald’s and Wal-Mart, are turning to payroll cards in lieu of paychecks. Businesses prefer the cards because they save $2.75 each time they electronically load the card instead of cutting a check, according to Aite Group, a Boston-based research and consulting firm.

But workers say using the cards means getting socked with fees, including some that aren’t disclosed, for everything from accessing their money to checking balances. Some workers have quickly run up fees of several hundred dollars over a year’s time.

Read more at Chicago Tribune